HomeVape NewsFDA Names Four New Members to Its Tobacco Advisory Panel

FDA Names Four New Members to Its Tobacco Advisory Panel

Date:

Related stories

NÜM Nicotine Pouches: Flavors, Strengths and How to Pick Your First Can

Sponsored article. Intended for adults aged 21 and over. WARNING:...

VOOPOO Argus G3 Review: The Pod Kit, Honestly Tested

The first thing you notice about the VOOPOO Argus...

How to Prime a Vape Coil

You unwrap a fresh coil, fit it, fill up,...

The FDA has filled four long-empty seats on its Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, the expert panel that must review every modified-risk tobacco application before the agency can grant one. The appointments were announced this week, even though the new members’ terms began on July 12, more than three months ago.

The four new voting members bring a mix of toxicology, clinical, behavioral, and consumer expertise to the panel:

New memberRole
Holger BehrsingRespiratory toxicologist at the Institute for In Vitro Sciences
Kim “Skip” MurrayGeneral public representative, Minnesota tobacco harm reduction advocate
Margaret NolanPhysician at HealthPartners Institute
Andrew StrasserDirector of the Biobehavioral Smoking Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania
Scientist in protective gloves handling test tubes in a laboratory, representing the toxicology and clinical expertise on the FDA's tobacco advisory panel

A consumer voice joins the panel

Murray is the appointment most likely to interest vapers. She was designated as the committee’s representative of the general public, and she comes with firsthand experience. A Minnesota tobacco harm reduction advocate, Murray has testified against a state flavour restriction bill, telling lawmakers that flavoured vaping helped her quit smoking. Having a former smoker who switched to flavoured vapes in the seat reserved for the public is a notable shift for a panel that has historically been stacked with abstinence-leaning academics.

What TPSAC actually does

TPSAC has 12 members, 9 of them voting, and it advises the FDA Commissioner on the safety, dependence, and health effects of tobacco products. By law, every modified-risk tobacco product application must go before the committee, although its opinions are strictly advisory. In practice, the panel’s vote carries real weight, since the FDA rarely overrules it on high-profile applications.

Why the timing matters

These seats had stood empty since January 31, when the terms of Mignonne Guy, Risa Robinson, NFN Scout, and Dona Upson expired. The committee last met on January 22 to review the 20 ZYN nicotine pouch modified-risk applications, which were granted on June 30 in a landmark covered in our report on the ZYN modified-risk decision.

Alongside the appointments, the FDA published a Federal Register notice on October 15 (docket FDA-2026-N-11624) seeking nominations for two more voting vacancies. Nominations submitted by December 14 will receive first consideration, so the panel’s makeup could change again within months.

With the committee finally at full strength, it is better positioned to do its job as the FDA weighs its PMTA framework overhaul, and every modified-risk decision from here on will pass through these twelve seats.

Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Author

  • Max Lazarus

    Max Lazarus is a staff writer at Vapefeat, where he covers product reviews, breaking industry news, and the trends shaping vape culture today. With hands-on experience testing devices, mods, and e-liquids across dozens of brands, Max focuses on honest, no-nonsense reviews that help readers separate genuine quality from marketing hype.

    Beyond reviews, Max keeps a close eye on regulatory shifts and market trends, writing to keep readers informed as the industry continues to evolve. When he's not testing the latest releases, he's digging through community forums and manufacturer data to stay ahead of what's next.

Max Lazarus
Max Lazarushttp://vapefeat.com
Max Lazarus is a staff writer at Vapefeat, where he covers product reviews, breaking industry news, and the trends shaping vape culture today. With hands-on experience testing devices, mods, and e-liquids across dozens of brands, Max focuses on honest, no-nonsense reviews that help readers separate genuine quality from marketing hype. Beyond reviews, Max keeps a close eye on regulatory shifts and market trends, writing to keep readers informed as the industry continues to evolve. When he's not testing the latest releases, he's digging through community forums and manufacturer data to stay ahead of what's next.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here